How to Scope a Technology Based Penetration Test: A Comprehensive Guide

In today’s fast paced digital landscape, organizations face an ever evolving threat landscape. Ensuring your systems, networks, and applications are secure requires proactive measures, such as penetration testing (pen testing). But before you dive into a pen test, it’s crucial to define the scope carefully especially when it comes to technology based environments.

In this blog, we'll break down the essential steps to effectively scope a technology based penetration test, covering key technologies, approaches, tools, and considerations for a thorough assessment.

What is a Penetration Test?

A penetration test simulates a real world cyberattack on your systems to identify vulnerabilities before malicious actors can exploit them. These tests evaluate the security of your infrastructure, applications, network protocols, and devices. For technology heavy environments, scoping the pen test is critical to ensure a comprehensive assessment while minimizing the risk of business disruptions.

Step 1: Identify the Target Technologies

Penetration testing isn’t a one size fits all approach. The first step in scoping your test is to identify the technologies that will be tested. Depending on the organization's tech stack, this could include:

  • Network Infrastructure: This includes the core components of the network, such as routers, firewalls, switches, DNS servers, and VPN configurations. Network penetration testing focuses on identifying vulnerabilities within these components.

  • Web Applications: Websites, APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), and web services are often targets for attackers. The technologies used to build web applications are diverse, including frameworks such as React, Angular, Node.js. Web application penetration testing evaluates the security of these applications, looking for vulnerabilities like those found within the OWASP top 10, a broad consensus about the most critical security risks to web applications.

  • Cloud Environments: With the increasing adoption of cloud computing, penetration testing has expanded to cover cloud environments like AWS (Amazon Web Services), Azure (Microsoft Azure), Google Cloud, Kubernetes clusters, and cloud storage services. Cloud security penetration testing focuses on misconfigurations, weak access controls, and potential data exposure within these environments.

  • Operating Systems: Different operating systems, such as Windows, Linux, macOS, mobile operating systems (Android/iOS), and embedded systems, have varying security considerations. Operating system and network service testing evaluates vulnerabilities in these systems, including unpatched services and weak authentication mechanisms.

  • Databases: Databases are critical for storing sensitive information. Common database technologies include MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, SQL Server, and Oracle. Penetration tests may target these databases to assess their security configurations and identify potential weaknesses.

  • IoT Devices: The Internet of Things (IoT) encompasses a vast range of interconnected devices, including smart devices and industrial control systems. IoT device security testing focuses on vulnerabilities that could expose these devices to unauthorized access or exploitation, including insecure communication channels and lack of encryption.

  • Mobile Apps: Mobile applications, particularly those for Android and iOS, are commonly used platforms and often store sensitive user data.Mobile application testing assesses the security of these apps, focusing on issues like insecure data storage and weak authentication mechanisms.

  • Security Devices: Security devices, such as intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS), security cameras, and biometric scanners, are designed to protect systems and data. Penetration tests may target these devices to evaluate their effectiveness and identify potential bypass techniques.

Each of these technologies has different security considerations, and the pen test should be tailored accordingly.

Step 2: Define the Testing Approach for Each Technology

Once you've identified the target technologies, the next step is to determine how each will be tested. The methodology can vary based on the environment:

  • Network Penetration Testing: This type of testing focuses on evaluating the security of your network infrastructure, including routers, switches, firewalls, and VPNs. The primary objective is to identify potential vulnerabilities within the network that could be exploited by attackers. Common tests include port scanning, vulnerability scanning, network sniffing, man in the middle attacks, and DNS poisoning. To perform these assessments, tools like Nmap, Nessus, and Metasploit are typically used to uncover weaknesses and simulate real world attack scenarios.

  • Web Application Penetration Testing: This testing involves evaluating the security of web applications, such as websites and APIs. The focus is on identifying vulnerabilities that could compromise the application’s integrity or user data. Common tests include SQL injection, Cross Site Scripting (XSS), broken authentication, and session management flaws. Tools like Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, SQLMap, and Nikto are used to perform these assessments, helping to detect and exploit potential weaknesses in the application.

  • Cloud Security Penetration Testing: This type of testing focuses on evaluating cloud environments such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud for misconfigurations, weak access controls, and potential sensitive data exposure. The goal is to identify vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access or data breaches. Common tests include checking for insecure storage buckets, misconfigured Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles, and unprotected APIs. Tools like CloudSploit, Prowler, and ScoutSuite are used to perform these tests, helping to uncover risks and ensure a secure cloud infrastructure.

  • Operating System and Network Service Testing: This testing evaluates vulnerabilities in operating systems and network services, such as file sharing protocols, remote desktop access, and system configurations. The aim is to identify weaknesses that could allow attackers to gain unauthorized access or escalate privileges within the network. Common tests include privilege escalation, detection of unpatched services, and exploitation of weak authentication mechanisms. Tools like Nessus, Metasploit, and Nmap are used to conduct these assessments, helping to identify and mitigate potential security risks in system configurations and network services.

  • Mobile Application Testing: This testing focuses on assessing the security of mobile applications to ensure that user data is securely stored and transmitted. The goal is to identify vulnerabilities that could compromise the app’s security and the privacy of its users. Common tests include checking for insecure storage of sensitive data, weak authentication mechanisms, and vulnerabilities that could allow for reverse engineering of the app. Tools like MobSF, Frida, and Burp Suite are typically used to perform these tests, helping to uncover security flaws in mobile apps and improve their overall security posture.

  • IoT Device Security Testing: This testing evaluates the security of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and the communication protocols they use, such as Bluetooth, Zigbee, or HTTP. The focus is on identifying vulnerabilities that could expose these devices to unauthorized access or exploitation. Common tests include checking for default credentials, insecure communication channels, and the lack of encryption in data transmissions. Tools like Shodan, IoT Inspector, and manual testing techniques are used to detect potential security flaws, helping to secure IoT devices and protect against cyber threats.

Step 3: Legal Considerations and Rules of Engagement (RoE)

Before conducting a penetration test, it is crucial to clearly define the legal and ethical boundaries. This begins with obtaining written consent from the client, which should outline the specific systems and technologies that will be tested. 

Establishing Rules of Engagement (RoE) is essential to define the boundaries and limitations of the penetration test. The RoE acts as a contract between the client and the testing team, outlining what is permissible and what is strictly prohibited during the test. Key elements of the RoE typically include:

Targets: Clearly define which systems, applications, and networks are within the scope of the test and which are off-limits.

Techniques: Specify the types of testing techniques that are allowed and those that are prohibited. This might involve restrictions on certain types of attacks, such as denial-of-service (DoS) attacks or social engineering tactics.

Data Sensitivity: Outline guidelines for handling sensitive data that may be encountered during the test. This could include procedures for data anonymization or secure data storage.

Communication: Establish protocols for communication between the testing team and the client, including reporting procedures, escalation paths for critical issues, and contact points for emergencies.

Legal Compliance: Ensure that the test is conducted in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, such as data protection laws and cybersecurity regulations.

Additionally, an impact assessment should be conducted, particularly for critical systems like live production environments or databases, to ensure that business continuity is not disrupted during testing. The impact assessment helps determine:

Potential Disruptions: The likelihood of the test causing service interruptions or downtime.

Data Loss Risk: The potential for the test to compromise sensitive data.

System Recovery: The time and resources required to restore the system to its original state if any issues arise during the test.

By conducting an impact assessment, organizations can mitigate risks and make informed decisions about the scope and intensity of the penetration test. For example, if the assessment identifies a high risk of disruption to a critical production system, the scope of the test might be adjusted to exclude that system or to use less intrusive testing techniques.

Step 4: Resourcing the Pen-Testing

Depending on the resources available within your organization you may be able to do resource penetration testing internally, most of the time however an organization will choose to engage an external partner who specializes in pen testing. Additionally, if a pen test is being performed to provide customer assurance, it is preferred by customers that an

An external party performs the testing. Before engaging an external partner, it is helpful to understand the scope, as well as the intended testing methodology. Pen-testing resourcing options:

Internal pen-testers: If the resources and appropriate technical capability is available this approach generally offers improved lead time over hiring an external partner, as well as environment specific knowledge that can make the testing approach more efficient

External pen-testers: In order to coordinate an external pen-test, a clear scope needs to be defined so that the partner can estimate the effort and required resource availability. The quality of the work and reporting is generally high, but the timelines will need to be clearly understood to meet the expectations of internal stakeholders such as a project team, or external stakeholders such as customers looking for assurance from a pen-test report.

Step 5: Select the Testing Methodology

The approach taken during a penetration test depends on the level of knowledge available about the target systems.

Black Box Testing: This method simulates an external attacker who has no prior knowledge of the system. The tester approaches the system with no internal information, such as system documentation, source code, or architecture. This approach helps identify vulnerabilities that are exploitable by attackers with limited knowledge of the system.

White Box Testing: In this methodology, the tester has complete access to system documentation, source code, and architecture. It simulates an insider attack or an attack by someone with privileged access. This approach allows for a more in-depth analysis of the system, leading to the discovery of vulnerabilities that might not be apparent in a black box test.

Grey Box Testing: This method falls between black box and white box testing. The tester has partial knowledge of the system, such as user credentials or network diagrams. This simulates an attacker who has gained some level of access to the environment. Grey box testing offers a balance between the breadth of black box testing and the depth of white box testing.

Here's a table summarizing the key differences between these testing methodologies:

Methodology Tester Knowledge Advantages Disadvantages
Black Box No prior knowledge Simulates real-world external attacks, identifies vulnerabilities exploitable with limited knowledge May not uncover all vulnerabilities, can be time-consuming
White Box Full access to system information Comprehensive analysis, identifies a wider range of vulnerabilities Unrealistic attack scenario, can be expensive and resource-intensive
Grey Box Partial knowledge Offers a balance between black box and white box, identifies vulnerabilities exploitable with some level of access May miss vulnerabilities only visible with full knowledge, requires careful scoping

Step 6: Define the Testing Tools and Techniques

Selecting the right tools is vital for efficient and effective testing. Based on the target technologies, you should choose tools that are best suited for each environment:

  • Web Application Testing: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, Nikto, SQLMap.

  • Network Testing: Nmap, Metasploit, Nessus.

  • Cloud Security: Prowler, CloudSploit, ScoutSuite.

  • Mobile Apps: MobSF, Frida, Drozer.

  • IoT Testing: Shodan, IoT Inspector.

Step 7: Reporting and Risk Mitigation

Once the penetration testing is complete, the next crucial step is to report the findings. Vulnerabilities should be classified by severity, ranging from critical to low, to help prioritize remediation efforts based on their potential impact. Each vulnerability should be accompanied by detailed technical descriptions, including proof of concept and attack vectors, explaining how the issue can be exploited in a real world scenario. Finally, the report should include mitigation recommendations, offering clear and actionable steps for fixing the vulnerabilities. 

Step 8: Post Engagement Activities

After the penetration test, it's essential to ensure proper remediation and re testing. Once vulnerabilities are fixed, remediation testing should be conducted to verify that the issues have been fully addressed and that no new vulnerabilities have been introduced. Following this, follow up reports should be provided, detailing the results of the remediation efforts. These reports should highlight whether the vulnerabilities were successfully mitigated and identify any remaining risks, offering a comprehensive overview of the system's current security status.

Conclusion: A Proactive Approach to Cybersecurity

A well scoped technology based penetration test is crucial for identifying weaknesses in your systems before they’re exploited by malicious actors. By focusing on the technologies in use whether it’s your cloud infrastructure, mobile apps, or web applications you can ensure a comprehensive, tailored test that covers your most critical assets.

By scoping your penetration test effectively, you’re not only identifying vulnerabilities but also taking proactive steps to strengthen your overall cybersecurity posture. Ensure your testing methodologies are aligned with your business goals, and choose the right tools and techniques to uncover hidden risks.

Ready to conduct your next penetration test? Make sure your scope is defined, your objectives are clear, and your approach is thorough because cybersecurity is a continuous journey, not a one time fix.

Previous
Previous

Strategic Security Planning: The Core of ISO 27001 Clause 6

Next
Next

The Critical Role of Leadership in ISO 27001 - Clause 5